i like this post (click again to cancel)
1
i dont like this post (click again to cancel) remove favorite mark from this question (click again to restore mark)

I am new to working with Bruker-style NMR data and am experiencing confusion with regard to Bruker's digital filtering. Some experiments on our Bruker spectrometers result in valid decim/dspfvs/grpdly values in the acqus output file, but other spectrometers give a value of -1 for grpdly. Does anyone know what this value means? More importantly, how can I calculate how many points to left-shift the Bruker fid for offline processing when grpdly does not contain the value?

Thank you.

asked Nov 11 '10 at 06:06

ChemMJW's gravatar image

ChemMJW
101


2 Answers:
i like this answer (click again to cancel)
1
i dont like this answer (click again to cancel)

My understanding is that before Topspin 2.1 the number of left-shift points was determined through a combination of DECIM and DSPVFS values - so maybe older spectrometers will use this and set GRPDLY as -1.

Post Topspin 2.1 GRPDLY is the flavour of the day and is the value for t=0 given in complex data points. The first order phase correction related to the digital is thus GRPDLY * 360o

When you have no GRPDLY I find using something like the 'bruker' script in NMRPipe will help you out, or maybe even using the avance phase feature in Azara.

Hope that makes sense! Best Wishes, Dan

link

answered Nov 11 '10 at 08:45

DanODonovan's gravatar image

DanODonovan
21

i like this answer (click again to cancel)
1
i dont like this answer (click again to cancel)

My understanding is that the GRPDLY parameter was added with the introduction of the Digital Receiver Unit (DRU). I'm not sure what XwinNMR/TopSpin release that correspondes to. Previous to this, there was a look-up table based on the DECIM and DSPVS parameters. I can send you a copy of this table, if you like.

On newer Bruker systems, using the "BASEOPT" digital filter will result in a very flat baseline with no "smilies" and zero (or very close to zero) residual first order phase correction simply by using the first order phase correction value optained by multiplying the GRPDLY parameter by 360.

link

answered Nov 15 '10 at 09:10

Kirk%20Marat's gravatar image

Kirk Marat
672

Your answer
Please start posting your answer anonymously - your answer will be saved within the current session and published after you log in or create a new account. Please try to give a good answer, for discussions, please use comments and please do remember to vote (login to vote)
toggle preview

powered by CNPROG