i like this post (click again to cancel)
0
i dont like this post (click again to cancel) remove favorite mark from this question (click again to restore mark)

I have seen many different protocols on making acrylamide gels for RDC measurements which include usually one of the following 1)drying the gel and re-swelling with protein solution 2)allowing equilibration of protein into an already swelled gel

It seems as though you can get a much higher protein conc. if you dry the gel so what is the advantage to letting it equilibrate?

Thanks

asked Jan 24 '12 at 08:42

andrewL's gravatar image

andrewL
1

Um.... Is this an NMR question? - Kirk Marat (Jan 26 '12 at 11:06)

It is an NMR sample preparation question for residual dipolar coupling experiments (IPAP). - andrewL (Jan 27 '12 at 07:03)


3 Answers:
i like this answer (click again to cancel)
0
i dont like this answer (click again to cancel)

I have heard that people use the soaking into a swelled gel method to avoid introducing inhomogeneity in the gel due to drying. I use the drying method, but I have seen that it can cause the gel to get a bubble in it.

link

answered Jan 30 '12 at 07:01

mikaelastewart's gravatar image

mikaelastewart
11

i like this answer (click again to cancel)
0
i dont like this answer (click again to cancel)

Hi Andrew,

It matters what kind of gel you are trying to prepare, i.e. either a compressed gel (where you set the plunger/piston in the shigemi tube to a certain level and then let the gel swell with the protein solution) or a stretched gel (where you use an apparatus to get the gel swollen with protein solution into the NMR tube). So, if it is compressed, I think one has to use a dry gel, while if it is stretched one has an option to do it two ways as you have mentioned.

I do agree with the previous answer that swelling a dried gel with protein solution might result in inhomogenous alignment (which could be inferred from the line shape of resonance lines).

Waj

link

answered Apr 19 '13 at 08:29

Bharathwaj's gravatar image

Bharathwaj
112

i like this answer (click again to cancel)
0
i dont like this answer (click again to cancel)

I've tried both, and find I prefer the drying method, and I never had any homogeneity problems with it. You do have to be careful to get the dried gel out of the casting chamber intact, and the gels are sticky so we always dried them on a teflon plate.

Three other practical notes:

  1. I always soaked the cast gel in several changes of water before drying to remove any unpolymerized acrylamide and polymerizing agents.
  2. The gel has to be completely dry before soaking. A 37-50 degree oven/incubator helps with that.
  3. It's a good idea to pre-soak the dry gel for just a few minutes with the same buffer your protein sample is in before adding your real protein sample, then pour it off and add the protein. This seems to help prevent your protein getting supersaturated and potentially crashing out as the water rushes into the gel. After that, I soak overnight before stretching into an NMR tube.
link

answered Apr 24 '13 at 07:06

Andrew%20Fowler's gravatar image

Andrew Fowler
96

Your answer
Please start posting your answer anonymously - your answer will be saved within the current session and published after you log in or create a new account. Please try to give a good answer, for discussions, please use comments and please do remember to vote (login to vote)
toggle preview

powered by CNPROG