ACD/NMR vs. MestReNova calculation difference

i like this post (click again to cancel)

i dont like this post (click again to cancel)

remove favorite mark from this question (click again to restore mark)

Hi there,

how is possible that peak area calculated by ACD/NMR is lower than the same one calculated by MestReNova software. For example 3.70 vs. 3.97 creates 11% difference in conversion of polymerization.

Thank you, Frank

software

asked Jun 20 '12 at 03:49

Frantisek Surman
1

updated Jun 20 '12 at 04:48

2 Answers:

oldest newest most voted

i like this answer (click again to cancel)

i dont like this answer (click again to cancel)

Also make sure that baseline correction is being done properly, or at least the same way, and the the integration limits are the same on the two programs. As a check, why not try it with TopSpin, SpinWorks, VNMRj or whatever else you may have available.

link

answered Jun 20 '12 at 13:45

Kirk Marat
711

Hi Frank, Maybe you are using a different integration algorithm. Mnova has two algorithms for the integration: 'Peaks' and 'Sum'. If your peak is broad, the Sum algorithm is recommended. For further info, please get in touch with us

link

answered Jun 20 '12 at 10:45

Mestrelab
56

updated Jun 20 '12 at 10:46

Here (once you log in) you will be able to sign up for the periodic email updates about this question.

Your answer

Please start posting your answer anonymously - your answer will be saved within the current session and published after you log in or create a new account. Please try to give a good answer, for discussions, please use comments and please do remember to vote (login to vote)

toggle preview

Tags:

software ×34

Asked: Jun 20 '12 at 03:49

Seen: 5,300 times

Last updated: Jun 20 '12 at 13:45

Related questions