simpson and spinevolution
i like this post (click again to cancel)
1
i dont like this post (click again to cancel) remove favorite mark from this question (click again to restore mark)

Hi, I'm about to start to implement a front end to simpson, and perhaps spinevolution. I wonder if anyone here have some comments on the use of simpson versus spinevolution and if there are any newer simulation platforms available.

Totte

asked Apr 01 '12 at 11:57

Dune%20Scientific's gravatar image

Dune Scientific
11
One Answer:
oldest newest most voted
i like this answer (click again to cancel)
0
i dont like this answer (click again to cancel)

I only know the features below: For a system with multiple 1/2 spin, spinevolution is faster For quadrupolar nuclei, simpson seems to be more professional Simpson supports optimal control.

link

answered Jun 06 '12 at 19:18

Frey's gravatar image

Frey
61

Your answer
Please start posting your answer anonymously - your answer will be saved within the current session and published after you log in or create a new account. Please try to give a good answer, for discussions, please use comments and please do remember to vote (login to vote)
toggle preview

about | faq | wiki | privacy policy | give feedback

powered by CNPROG