Revision history[back]
click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

posted Jun 20 '12 at 16:56

Jana's gravatar image

Jana
31

Excitation bandwidth for a shaped pulse

Hi all, I have a small question on excitation bandwidth for shaped pulses. In many of the literature, the field strength ( nu (Hz) = Gamma * B1/(2 * pi)) of the shaped pulse is specified, so i use it to determine the pulse width (tp) using the relations,

omega * t_p = theta; & Omega = 2 * pi * nu

t_p= theta/(2 * pi * nu) [sec]

On knowing 't_p' value, i can use 'shape tools' available in Bruker to calculate the power level of the shaped pulse in comparison to a 90 degree hard pulse. My question is-- is the nu(Hz) value mentioned in the literature, the actual excitation bandwidth of the shaped pulse?

Thank you!

click to hide/show revision 2
No.1 Revision

posted Jun 21 '12 at 03:02

Evgeny%20Fadeev's gravatar image

Evgeny Fadeev
5771

Excitation bandwidth for a shaped pulse

Hi all, I have a small question on excitation bandwidth for shaped pulses. In many of the literature, the field strength ( nu (Hz) = Gamma * B1/(2 B_1/(2 * pi)) pi)) of the shaped pulse is specified, so i use it to determine the pulse width (tp) (t_p) using the relations,

omega * t_p = theta; & Omega = 2 * pi * nu

nu

t_p= theta/(2 * pi * nu) [sec]

[sec]

On knowing 't_p' value, i can use 'shape tools' available in Bruker to calculate the power level of the shaped pulse in comparison to a 90 degree hard pulse. My question is-- is the nu(Hz) value mentioned in the literature, the actual excitation bandwidth of the shaped pulse?

Thank you!

powered by CNPROG