Revision history[back]
click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

posted Dec 11 '09 at 10:40

Evgeny%20Fadeev's gravatar image

Evgeny Fadeev
5771

Optimal sample length with Shigemi tubes.

Our coil area length is 16 mm. Should we be making samples exactly 16 mm long in the Shigemi tubes for the best sensitivity (assuming that we are limited on amount of material)?

For example, we use D2O matched shigemi tubes for samples in 90/10 H2O/D2O. Is susceptibility matching affected by switch from D2O to H2O?

Thanks!

click to hide/show revision 2
No.1 Revision

posted Dec 11 '09 at 10:40

Evgeny%20Fadeev's gravatar image

Evgeny Fadeev
5771

Optimal sample length with Shigemi tubes.

Our coil area length is 16 mm. Should we be making samples exactly 16 mm long in the Shigemi tubes for the best sensitivity (assuming that we are limited on amount of material)?

For example, we use D2O matched shigemi tubes for samples in 90/10 H2O/D2O. Is susceptibility matching affected by switch from D2O to H2O?

Thanks!

click to hide/show revision 3
No.2 Revision

posted Aug 13 '10 at 14:13

Evgeny%20Fadeev's gravatar image

Evgeny Fadeev
5771

Optimal What is the optimal sample length with Shigemi tubes.tubes?

Our coil area length is 16 mm. Should we be making samples exactly 16 mm long in the Shigemi tubes for the best sensitivity (assuming that we are limited on amount of material)?

For example, we use D2O matched shigemi tubes for samples in 90/10 H2O/D2O. Is susceptibility matching affected by switch from D2O to H2O?

Thanks!

powered by CNPROG