Hi, I am puzzled with a determination of multiplicity of a spectrum. When to use abreviation m? And how to cut a bunch of signals? From peak to peak or from the bottom to bottom. The last way is less precise.
1 |
initial version
|
posted Aug 31 '09 at 14:12 rusta |
Hi, I am puzzled with a determination of multiplicity of a spectrum. When to use abreviation m? And how to cut a bunch of signals? From peak to peak or from the bottom to bottom. The last way is less precise.
2 |
No.1 Revision
|
posted Sep 01 '09 at 10:17 Evgeny Fadeev |
Hi, I am puzzled with a determination of multiplicity of a spectrum. When to use abreviation m? And how to cut a bunch of signals? From peak to peak or from the bottom to bottom. The last way is less precise.
3 |
No.2 Revision
|
posted Sep 01 '09 at 10:23 Evgeny Fadeev |
Hi, I am puzzled with a determination of multiplicity of a spectrum. When to use abreviation m? And how to cut a bunch of signals? From peak to peak or from the bottom to bottom. The last way is less precise.
4 |
No.3 Revision
|
posted Sep 01 '09 at 10:23 Evgeny Fadeev |
Hi, I am puzzled with a determination of multiplicity of a spectrum. When to use abreviation m? And how to cut a bunch of signals? From peak to peak or from the bottom to bottom. The last way is less precise.
5 |
No.4 Revision
|
posted Sep 01 '09 at 14:04 Evgeny Fadeev |
Hi, I am puzzled with a determination of multiplicity of a spectrum. When to use abreviation m? And how to cut a bunch of signals? From peak to peak or from the bottom to bottom. The last way is less precise.
6 |
No.5 Revision
|
posted Nov 18 '09 at 14:27 Evgeny Fadeev |
Hi, I am puzzled with a determination of multiplicity of a spectrum. When to use abreviation m? And how to cut a bunch of signals? From peak to peak or from the bottom to bottom. The last way is less precise.