The answer certainly depends on the association and dissociation (kon/koff) rates as Paul Driscoll has suggested. In addition, the availability of isotope labeled samples for protein and/or peptide will be a major factor in deciding the type of experiments.

However, the following experiments would be expected to yield usable results over wide range of kon/koff rates.

1) Protein titration: Carry out a series of experiments (TOCSY or HSQC or NOESY) keeping the ligand concentration fixed, with variable protein concentration.

You would expect that a new peak with intensity proportional to the total concentration of the complex would appear for resonance signals of residues that bind tightly (slow exchange).

You would expect that the chemical shift changes as the ligand:protein concentration changes for resonance signals of residues that bind weakly (fast exchange).

There will be a line broadening and the signal might even be wiped out for residues that are in intermediate exchange.

You may observe that different nuclei of the same residue are in different exchange rate regimes, i.e., some resonances of a residue may indicate slow exchange whereas other resonance resonances of the same residue may indicate intermediate/fast exchange. This is because the designation of slow/intermediate/fast exchange depends on both the rate of exchange as well as the difference in chemical shifts of the free ligand and the bound complex. To determine the relative relative binding affinities of different aminoacids of the same peptide, it might be best to rely on results obtained by comparing the data for the backbone amide NH protons.

The major problem with this experiment would be that it is, in general, difficult to prepare samples with a wide variation in protein concentrations. It is usual to do the complimentary experiment, i.e., keep the protein concentration fixed and vary the ligand concentration (ligand titration e.g. Peili Zhang, Sekhar Talluri, Haiyan Deng, Daniel Branton and Gerhard Wagner. Structure, Volume 3, Issue 11, 1185-1195, 1 November 1995).

2) An alternative The following experiment is based on the fact that the rate of H/D exchange is expected to be slower in a complex than in the free ligand. Obtain a 2D NMR spectrum (HSQC if 15N labeled sample is available, TOCSY/NOESY otherwise) on a sample containing 50ul D2O and 400ul H2O. Add 400ul of D20 and repeat the same experiment. experiment, immediately. Amide HN that are buried within the complex would be expected to exchange with solvent deuterons slowly slowly, whereas amide HN of the peptide that are not involved in the complex would be expected to exchange with the solvent deuterons rapidly. Repeat the experiment at a series of intervals (preferably 1/2 hour intervals if your spectrometer is good enough). The intensities of the amide HN that are not involved in the complex formation will be reduced in intensity are expected to reduce more rapidly than those of HN that are involved in complex formation (final intensity will be ~1/4 of initial intensity) first. Whereas, the HN that are involved in formation of the complex and buried at the interface would lose intensity most slowly. intensity). For a very stable complex, there may be no loss of signal intensity in the time period of your study (after the dilution factor has been corrected for).

This experiment exploits the competition between the rate of two dynamical processes: exchange (HN/DN) and the rate of dissociation of the complex. It is possible to tune the rate of H/D exchange over a wide range of values by proper choice of the pH. In addition the ratio of ligand:protein concentrations can be varied. As a consequence, this experiment has the ability to probe interactions over a very wide range of dissociation rates.

The primary limitation of this experiment is that only exchangeable hydrogen atoms of the peptide/protein can be used a probes of binding.

3) If isotope labeled samples are available, a wide variety of isotope editing and isotope filtering experiments will be possible, as other have mentioned before.

Other experiments based on the transferred NOE principle are also available, but these are limited to specific ranges of dissociation rates. (See Ref. Feng Ni, Yvonne C. Meinwald, Max Vasquez, Harold A. Scheraga. Biochemistry, 1989, 28 (7), pp 3094–3105).

The answer certainly depends on the association and dissociation (kon/koff) rates as Paul Driscoll has suggested. In addition, the availability of isotope labeled samples for protein and/or peptide will be a major factor in deciding the type of experiments.

However, the following experiments would be expected to yield usable results over a wide range of kon/koff rates.

1) Protein titration: Carry out a series of experiments (TOCSY or HSQC or NOESY) keeping the ligand concentration fixed, with variable protein concentration.

You would expect that a new peak with intensity proportional to the total concentration of the complex would appear for resonance signals of residues that bind tightly (slow exchange).

You would expect that the chemical shift changes as the ligand:protein concentration changes for resonance signals of residues that bind weakly (fast exchange).

There will be a line broadening and the signal might even be wiped out for residues that are in intermediate exchange.

You may observe that different nuclei of the same residue are in different exchange rate regimes, i.e., some resonances of a residue may indicate slow exchange whereas other resonances of the same residue may indicate intermediate/fast exchange. This is because the designation of slow/intermediate/fast exchange depends on both the rate of exchange as well as the difference in chemical shifts of the free ligand and the bound complex. To determine the relative binding affinities of different aminoacids of the same peptide, it might be best to rely on results obtained by comparing the data for the backbone amide NH protons.

The major problem with this experiment would be that it is, in general, difficult to prepare samples with a wide variation in protein concentrations. It is usual to do the complimentary experiment, i.e., keep the protein concentration fixed and vary the ligand concentration (ligand titration e.g. Peili Zhang, Sekhar Talluri, Haiyan Deng, Daniel Branton and Gerhard Wagner. Structure, Volume 3, Issue 11, 1185-1195, 1 November 1995).

2) The following experiment is based on the fact that the rate of H/D exchange is expected to be slower in a complex than in the free ligand. Obtain a 2D NMR spectrum (HSQC if 15N labeled sample is available, TOCSY/NOESY otherwise) on a sample containing 50ul D2O and 400ul H2O. Add 400ul of D20 and repeat the same experiment, immediately. Amide HN that are buried within the complex would be expected to exchange with solvent deuterons slowly, whereas amide HN of the peptide that are not involved in the complex would be expected to exchange with the solvent deuterons rapidly. Repeat the experiment at a series of intervals (preferably 1/2 hour intervals if your spectrometer is good enough). The intensities of the amide HN that are not involved in complex formation are expected to reduce more rapidly than those of HN that are involved in complex formation (final intensity will be ~1/4 of initial intensity). For a very stable complex, there may be no loss of signal intensity in the time period of your study (after the dilution factor has been corrected for).

This experiment exploits the competition between two dynamical processes: exchange (HN/DN) and dissociation of the complex. It is possible to tune the rate of H/D exchange over a wide range of values by proper choice of the pH. In addition the ratio of ligand:protein concentrations can be varied. As a consequence, this experiment has the ability to probe interactions over a very wide range of dissociation rates.

The primary limitation of this experiment is that only exchangeable hydrogen atoms of the peptide/protein can be used a probes of binding.

3) If isotope labeled samples are available, a wide variety of isotope editing and isotope filtering experiments will be possible, as other have mentioned before.

Other experiments based on the transferred NOE principle are also available, but these are limited to specific ranges of dissociation rates. (See Ref. Feng Ni, Yvonne C. Meinwald, Max Vasquez, Harold A. Scheraga. Biochemistry, 1989, 28 (7), pp 3094–3105).

The answer certainly depends on the association and dissociation (kon/koff) rates as Paul Driscoll has suggested. In addition, the availability of isotope labeled samples for protein and/or peptide will be a major factor in deciding the type of experiments.

However, the following experiments would be expected to yield usable results over a wide range of kon/koff rates.

1) Protein titration: Carry out a series of experiments (TOCSY or HSQC or NOESY) keeping the ligand concentration fixed, with variable protein concentration.

You would expect that a new peak with intensity proportional to the total concentration of the complex would appear for resonance signals of residues that bind tightly (slow exchange).

You would expect that the chemical shift changes as the ligand:protein concentration changes for resonance signals of residues that bind weakly (fast exchange).

There will be a line broadening and the signal might even be wiped out for residues that are in intermediate exchange.

You may observe that different nuclei of the same residue are in different exchange rate regimes, i.e., some resonances of a residue may indicate slow exchange whereas other resonances of the same residue may indicate intermediate/fast exchange. This is because the designation of slow/intermediate/fast exchange depends on both the rate of exchange as well as the difference in chemical shifts of the free ligand and the bound complex. To determine the relative binding affinities of different aminoacids of the same peptide, it might be best to rely on results obtained by comparing the data for the backbone amide NH protons.

The major problem with this experiment would be that it is, in general, difficult to prepare samples with a wide variation in protein concentrations. It is usual to do the complimentary experiment, i.e., keep the protein concentration fixed and vary the ligand concentration (ligand titration e.g. Peili Zhang, Sekhar Talluri, Haiyan Deng, Daniel Branton and Gerhard Wagner. Structure, Volume 3, Issue 11, 1185-1195, 1 November 1995).

Experiments of this type assume that binding leads to a change in chemical shift - although it is true in most cases, it is not necessary.

2) The following experiment is based on the fact that the rate of H/D exchange is expected to be slower in a complex than in the free ligand. Obtain a 2D NMR spectrum (HSQC if 15N labeled sample is available, TOCSY/NOESY otherwise) on a sample containing 50ul D2O and 400ul H2O. Add 400ul of D20 and repeat the same experiment, immediately. Amide HN that are buried within the complex would be expected to exchange with solvent deuterons slowly, whereas amide HN of the peptide that are not involved in the complex would be expected to exchange with the solvent deuterons rapidly. Repeat the experiment at a series of intervals (preferably 1/2 hour intervals if your spectrometer is good enough). The intensities of the amide HN that are not involved in complex formation are expected to reduce more rapidly than those of HN that are involved in complex formation (final intensity will be ~1/4 of initial intensity). For a very stable complex, there may be no loss of signal intensity in the time period of your study (after the dilution factor has been corrected for).

This experiment exploits the competition between two dynamical processes: exchange (HN/DN) and dissociation of the complex. It is possible to tune the rate of H/D exchange over a wide range of values by proper choice of the pH. In addition the ratio of ligand:protein concentrations can be varied. As a consequence, this experiment has the ability to probe interactions over a very wide range of dissociation rates.

The primary limitation of this experiment is that only exchangeable hydrogen atoms of the peptide/protein can be used a probes of binding.

3) If isotope labeled samples are available, a wide variety of isotope editing and isotope filtering experiments will be possible, as other have mentioned before.

Other experiments based on the transferred NOE principle are also available, but these are limited to specific ranges of dissociation rates. (See Ref. Feng Ni, Yvonne C. Meinwald, Max Vasquez, Harold A. Scheraga. Biochemistry, 1989, 28 (7), pp 3094–3105).

The answer certainly depends on the association and dissociation (kon/koff) rates as Paul Driscoll has suggested. In addition, the availability of isotope labeled samples for protein and/or peptide will be a major factor in deciding the type of experiments.

However, the following experiments would be expected to yield usable results over a wide range of kon/koff rates.

1) Protein titration: Carry out a series of experiments (TOCSY or HSQC or NOESY) keeping the ligand concentration fixed, with variable protein concentration.

You would expect that a new peak with intensity proportional to the total concentration of the complex would appear for resonance signals of residues that bind tightly (slow exchange).

You would expect that the chemical shift changes as the ligand:protein concentration changes for resonance signals of residues that bind weakly (fast exchange).

There will be a line broadening and the signal might even be wiped out for residues that are in intermediate exchange.

You may observe that different nuclei of the same residue are in different exchange rate regimes, i.e., some resonances of a residue may indicate slow exchange whereas other resonances of the same residue may indicate intermediate/fast exchange. This is because the designation of slow/intermediate/fast exchange depends on both the rate of exchange as well as the difference in chemical shifts of the free ligand and the bound complex. To determine the relative binding affinities of different aminoacids of the same peptide, it might be best to rely on results obtained by comparing the data for the backbone amide NH protons.

The major problem with this experiment would be that it is, in general, difficult to prepare samples with a wide variation in protein concentrations. It is usual to do the complimentary experiment, i.e., keep the protein concentration fixed and vary the ligand concentration (ligand titration e.g. Peili Zhang, Sekhar Talluri, Haiyan Deng, Daniel Branton and Gerhard Wagner. Structure, Volume 3, Issue 11, 1185-1195, 1 November 1995).

Experiments of this type assume that binding leads to a change in chemical shift - although it is true in most cases, it is not necessary.

2) The following experiment is based on the fact that the rate of H/D exchange is expected to be slower in a complex than in the free ligand. Obtain a 2D NMR spectrum (HSQC if 15N labeled sample is available, TOCSY/NOESY otherwise) on a sample containing 50ul D2O and 400ul H2O. Add 400ul of D20 and repeat the same experiment, immediately. Amide HN that are buried within the complex would be expected to exchange with solvent deuterons slowly, whereas amide HN of the peptide that are not involved in the complex would be expected to exchange with the solvent deuterons rapidly. Repeat the experiment at a series of intervals (preferably 1/2 hour intervals if your spectrometer is good enough). The intensities of the amide HN that are not involved in complex formation are expected to reduce more rapidly than those of HN that are involved in complex formation (final intensity will be ~1/4 of initial intensity). For a very stable complex, there may be no loss of signal intensity in the time period of your study (after the dilution factor has been corrected for).

This experiment exploits the competition between two dynamical processes: exchange (HN/DN) and dissociation of the complex. It is possible to tune the rate of H/D exchange over a wide range of values by proper choice of the pH. In addition the ratio of ligand:protein concentrations can be varied. As a consequence, this experiment has the ability to probe interactions over a very wide range of dissociation rates.

The primary limitation of this experiment is that only exchangeable hydrogen atoms of the peptide/protein can be used a probes of binding.

3) If isotope labeled samples are available, a wide variety of isotope editing and editing and isotope filtering filtering experiments will be possible, as other others have mentioned before.

Other experiments based on the transferred NOE principle are also available, but these are limited to specific ranges of dissociation rates. (See Ref. Feng Ni, Yvonne C. Meinwald, Max Vasquez, Harold A. Scheraga. Biochemistry, 1989, 28 (7), pp 3094–3105).

Measurement of relaxation rates rates and dipolar coupling constants can also provide valuable information regarding the residues that are involved in binding.

The answer certainly depends on the association and dissociation (kon/koff) rates as Paul Driscoll has suggested. In addition, the availability of isotope labeled samples for protein and/or peptide will be a major factor in deciding the type of experiments.

However, the following experiments would be expected to yield usable results over a wide range of kon/koff rates.

1) Protein titration: Carry out a series of experiments (TOCSY or HSQC or NOESY) keeping the ligand concentration fixed, with variable protein concentration.

You would expect that a new peak with intensity proportional to the total concentration of the complex would appear for resonance signals of residues that bind tightly (slow exchange).

You would expect that the chemical shift changes as the ligand:protein concentration changes for resonance signals of residues that bind weakly (fast exchange).

There will be a line broadening and the signal might even be wiped out for residues that are in intermediate exchange.

You may observe that different nuclei of the same residue are in different exchange rate regimes, i.e., some resonances of a residue may indicate slow exchange whereas other resonances of the same residue may indicate intermediate/fast exchange. This is because the designation of slow/intermediate/fast exchange depends on both the rate of exchange as well as the difference in chemical shifts of the free ligand and the bound complex. To determine the relative binding affinities of different aminoacids of the same peptide, it might be best to rely on results obtained by comparing the data for the backbone amide NH protons.

The major problem with this experiment would be that it is, in general, difficult to prepare samples with a wide variation in protein concentrations. It is usual to do the complimentary experiment, i.e., keep the protein concentration fixed and vary the ligand concentration (ligand titration e.g. Peili Zhang, Sekhar Talluri, Haiyan Deng, Daniel Branton and Gerhard Wagner. Structure, Volume 3, Issue 11, 1185-1195, 1 November 1995).

Experiments of this type assume that binding leads to a change in chemical shift - although it is true in most cases, it is not necessary.

2) The following experiment is based on the fact that the rate of H/D exchange is expected to be slower in a complex than in the free ligand. Obtain a 2D NMR spectrum (HSQC if 15N labeled sample is available, TOCSY/NOESY otherwise) on a sample containing 50ul D2O and 400ul H2O. Add 400ul of D20 and repeat the same experiment, immediately. Amide HN that are buried within the complex would be expected to exchange with solvent deuterons slowly, whereas amide HN of the peptide that are not involved in the complex would be expected to exchange with the solvent deuterons rapidly. Repeat the experiment at a series of intervals (preferably 1/2 hour intervals if your spectrometer is good enough). The intensities of the amide HN that are not involved in complex formation are expected to reduce more rapidly than those of HN that are involved in complex formation (final intensity will be ~1/4 of initial intensity). For a very stable complex, there may be no loss of signal intensity in the time period of your study (after the dilution factor has been corrected for).

This experiment exploits the competition between two dynamical processes: exchange (HN/DN) and dissociation of the complex. It is possible to tune the rate of H/D exchange over a wide range of values by proper choice of the pH. In addition the ratio of ligand:protein concentrations can be varied. As a consequence, this experiment has the ability to probe interactions over a very wide range of dissociation rates.

The primary limitation of this experiment is that only exchangeable hydrogen atoms of the peptide/protein can be used a probes of binding.

3) If isotope labeled samples are available, a wide variety of isotope editing and isotope filtering experiments will be possible, as others have mentioned before.

Other experiments based on the transferred NOE principle are also available, but these are limited to specific ranges of dissociation rates. (See Ref. Feng Ni, Yvonne C. Meinwald, Max Vasquez, Yasuo Konishi, Harold A. Scheraga. Biochemistry, 1989, 28 (7), 1990, 29 (18), pp 3094–3105).4479–4489).

Measurement of relaxation rates and dipolar coupling constants can also provide valuable information regarding the residues that are involved in binding.

The answer certainly depends on the association and dissociation (kon/koff) rates as Paul Driscoll has suggested. In addition, the availability of isotope labeled samples for protein and/or peptide will be a major factor in deciding the type of experiments.

However, the following experiments would be expected to yield usable results over a wide range of kon/koff rates.

1) Protein titration: Carry out a series of experiments (TOCSY or HSQC or NOESY) keeping the ligand concentration fixed, with variable protein concentration.

You would expect that a new peak with intensity proportional to the total concentration of the complex would appear for resonance signals of residues that bind tightly (slow exchange).

You would expect that the chemical shift changes as the ligand:protein concentration changes for resonance signals of residues that bind weakly (fast exchange).

There will be a line broadening and the signal might even be wiped out for residues that are in intermediate exchange.

You may observe that different nuclei of the same residue are in different exchange rate regimes, i.e., some resonances of a residue may indicate slow exchange whereas other resonances of the same residue may indicate intermediate/fast exchange. This is because the designation of slow/intermediate/fast exchange depends on both the rate of exchange as well as the difference in chemical shifts of the free ligand and the bound complex. To determine the relative binding affinities of different aminoacids of the same peptide, it might be best to rely on results obtained by comparing the data for the backbone amide NH protons.

The major problem with this experiment would be that it is, in general, difficult to prepare samples with a wide variation in protein concentrations. It is usual to do the complimentary experiment, i.e., keep the protein concentration fixed and vary the ligand concentration (ligand titration e.g. Peili Zhang, Sekhar Talluri, Haiyan Deng, Daniel Branton and Gerhard Wagner. Structure, Volume 3, Issue 11, 1185-1195, 1 November 1995).

Experiments of this type assume that binding leads to a change in chemical shift - although it is true in most cases, it is not necessary.

2) The following experiment is based on the fact that the rate of H/D exchange is expected to be slower in a complex than in the free ligand. Obtain a 2D NMR spectrum (HSQC if 15N labeled sample is available, TOCSY/NOESY otherwise) on a sample containing 50ul D2O and 400ul H2O. Add 400ul of D20 and repeat the same experiment, immediately. Amide HN that are buried within the complex would be expected to exchange with solvent deuterons slowly, whereas amide HN of the peptide that are not involved in the complex would be expected to exchange with the solvent deuterons rapidly. Repeat the experiment at a series of intervals (preferably 1/2 hour intervals if your spectrometer is good enough). The intensities of the amide HN that are not involved in complex formation are expected to reduce more rapidly than those of HN that are involved in complex formation (final intensity will be ~1/4 of initial intensity). For a very stable complex, there may be no loss of signal intensity in the time period of your study (after the dilution factor has been corrected for).

This experiment exploits the competition between two dynamical processes: exchange (HN/DN) and dissociation of the complex. It is possible to tune the rate of H/D exchange over a wide range of values by proper choice of the pH. In addition the ratio of ligand:protein concentrations can be varied. As a consequence, this experiment has the ability to probe interactions over a very wide range of dissociation rates.

The primary limitation of this experiment is that only exchangeable hydrogen atoms of the peptide/protein can be used a probes of binding.

3) If isotope labeled samples are available, a wide variety of isotope editing and isotope filtering experiments will be possible, as others have mentioned before.

Other experiments based on the transferred NOE principle are also available, but these are limited to specific ranges of dissociation rates. (See Ref. Feng Ni, Yasuo Konishi, Harold A. Scheraga. Biochemistry, 1990, 29 (18), Scheraga Acc. Chem. Res., 1994, 27 (9), pp 4479–4489).257–264).

Measurement of relaxation rates and dipolar coupling constants can also provide valuable information regarding the residues that are involved in binding.