Revision history [back]
click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

posted Jul 01 '10 at 19:58

Evgeny%20Fadeev's gravatar image

Evgeny Fadeev
5771

That you have better S/N in HNCO can be explained by that 3D experiment effectively has very many scans. The peak intensity adds up from all the increments in all dimensions. Of course not all increments are equal in contributing to the peak, those with longer evolution times will probably contribute less. Also, more increments up until digital resolution approaches the natural line width will increase peak height (relative to noise) significantly, because line will be narrower.
click to hide/show revision 2
No.1 Revision

posted Jul 01 '10 at 20:06

Evgeny%20Fadeev's gravatar image

Evgeny Fadeev
5771

That you have better S/N in HNCO can be explained by that 3D experiment effectively has very many scans. The peak intensity adds up from all the increments in all dimensions.

Of course not all increments are equal in contributing to the peak, those with longer evolution times will probably contribute less.

Also, more increments up until digital resolution approaches the natural line width will increase peak height (relative to noise) significantly, because line will be narrower.gradually narrowing.

powered by CNPROG